Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/2731/2024 of SMT. BHARATHI Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010162292024 NC: 2026:KHC:53631 CRL.P No. 2731 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2731 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BHARATHI W/O LATE SHRI CHANDRASHEKAR AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2731 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. BHARATHI
W/O LATE SHRI CHANDRASHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
2ND FLOOR, NO.5, 1ST MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, T G LAYOUT,
ITTAMADU
BANASHANKARI, 3RD STAGE
BANGALORE-560 085
2.
DR SHIVAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
S/O SHRI K MANI
R/A NO.61, 9TH CROSS
5TH MAIN, RC AGRAHARA
CHAMARAJPET
BANGALORE-560 018
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VISHWANATH N, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.K ACHHUKATTU POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY THE
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001
2.
PRASAD T.N
S/O LATE M K NAGARAJ
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
NO.248, 2ND G MAIN,
11TH BLOCK
NEAR VINAYAKA PARK
NAGARABAHVI 2ND PHASE
BANGALORE-560072
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF PRAYING TO QUASH
THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.14924/2023 ON THE
FILE OF THE LEARNED II ACMM BENGALURU CITY IN SO FAR
AS IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER HEREIN WHO ARE
ACCUSED
NO.1
AND
IN
THE
SAID
PROCEEDINGS
REGISTERED ON THE FILE OF RESPONDENT C.K.ACHHUKATTU
POLICE
FOR
THE
COMMISSION
OF
OFFENCE
ALLEGED
U/S.341,448,504,506,149 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Despite granting sufficient opportunity to the petitioners to comply the office objections, the same has not been done by the petitioners.
2. The matter was listed today for dismissal, despite there is no representation for the petitioners.
3. This petition is of the year 2024 and there is no reason to grant further time to comply the office objections and it could be presumed that the petitioners are not interested to pursue this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
4. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
CR/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10