Karnataka High Court
WP/21066/2026 of ANDREW LOBO Vs UNION OF INDIA on 28 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010471312026 NC: 2026:KHC:53575 WP No. 21066 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 21066 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: ANDREW LOBO SON OF THE LATE BRIG JJD LOBO, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION NO. 21066 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
ANDREW LOBO
SON OF THE LATE BRIG JJD LOBO,
AGED 66 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.8, 1ST CROSS,
LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU - 56000.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.M. ARUN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA
BY ITS SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS,
3RD FLOOR, KARTAVYA BHAWAN - 1,
NEW DELHI - 110 001.
2.
INVESTOR EDUCATION AND
PROTECTION FUND AUTHORITY,
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, GROUND FLOOR,
JEEVAN VIHAR BUILDING,
3, PARLIAMENT STREET,
NEW DELHI - 110 001,
REP. BY SECRETARY.
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
3.
PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
3RD FLOOR, 'C' WING,
LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, KHAN MARKET,
NEW DELHI - 110 003.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. T.R. SATHYAVATHI, CGC FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) DIRECT THE 3RD
RESPONDENT TO RELEASE THE PAYMENT OF RS.31,38,329/- (RUPEES THIRTY ONE LAKH THIRTY EIGHT THOUSAND AND
THREE HUNDRED AND TWENTY NINE ONLY) AS PER LETTER
DATED 02.12.2025 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
AUTHORITY, VIDE ANNEXURE E AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a Memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.
Said Memo is accepted. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for in the Memo.
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
VN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 103