Karnataka High Court
WP/10646/2024 of SMT H PREMA Vs K. CHANDRAPPA on 28 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010210752024 NC: 2026:KHC:53560 WP No. 10646 of 2024 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 10646 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. H.PREMA W/O. H.KUSHAL RAJ, AGED ABOUT 74
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
WRIT PETITION NO. 10646 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. H.PREMA
W/O. H.KUSHAL RAJ,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF 4TH CROSS,
B.H.ROAD, BHADRAVATHI,
SHIMOGA DISTRICT-577 301,
REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER.
K. JAGANNATH.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.VARADARAJ RANGANATHA RAO., ADVOCATE)
AND:
K.CHANDRAPPA
S/O. K.LAKSHMANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF VISVESWARAIAH NAGAR,
NEAR HEBBUR COLLEGE, OLD TOWN,
BHADRAVATHI,
SHIMOGA DISTRICT-577 301.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MADHUKAR.M.DESHPANDE., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF THE
COURT
OF
ADDL.
SENIOR
CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
JMFC
BHADRAVATHI IN RA NO.78/2022, INCLUDING IMPUGNED
Digitally signed by
SUMATHY KANNAN
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
ORDER DATED 14/12/2023, PASSED THEREIN (ANNEXURE-A)
FOR VERIFYING THE FACTUAL CORRECTNESS AND LEGALITY
OF THE SAME. TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
14/12/2023 (ANNEXURE-A) PASSED IN RA 78/2022 BY THE
SAID COURT OF ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHADRAVATHI, BY ALLOWING THE WP WITH A DIRECTION TO
THE RESPONDENT TO STOP CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING ON
THE ENCROACHED SUIT PROPERTY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. A memo has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, wherein it is stated that the order challenged before this Court arose out of appeal bearing R.A.No.78 of 2022 before the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Bhadravathi and that the appeal has finally been decided on 14.12.2023 and hence the matter has become infructuous.
2. The memo is taken on record.
HC-KAR
3. The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA