Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/571/2024 of SRI. SIBGHATHULLA KHAN Vs STATE BY NANDINI LAYOUT POLICE STATION on 25 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010027232024 NC: 2026:KHC:53285 CRL.P No. 571 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 571 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SIBGHATHULLA KHAN S/O. SHAMIULLA KHAN, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 571 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SIBGHATHULLA KHAN
S/O. SHAMIULLA KHAN,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.16,
'C' STREET, THIMMAIAH ROAD,
BHARATHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SRI. KHALEEMULLA KHAN
S/O. LATE SHAMIULLA KHAN,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 16,
'C' STREET, THIMMAIAH ROAD,
BHARATHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
STATE BY NANDINI LAYOUT POLICE STATION
NANDINI LAYOUT,
BENGALURU - 560 096,
BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SMT. AKHILA BANU
D/O. LATE MUSTAFA,
AGED 36 YEARS,
R/O. NO.370,
SANJAY GANDHI NAGAR,
NANDINI LAYOUT,
BENGALURU - 560 079.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P., HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. M.N. NINGARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING THAT TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN S.C.NO.639/2022
(CR.NO.245/2021) FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 376, 417, 506
R/W 34 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF LIII ADDITIONAL
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-34).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
During the course of argument, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for respondent No.2 that now that Trial has been commenced in S.C.No.639/2022 (arising out of Crime No.245/2021 registered by the Nandini Layout Police Station) before the Trial Court, which is challenged in this petition. As such, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to urge all their contentions before the Trial Court.
2. Placing submission on record, the petition is disposed of.
3. However, the petitioners are at liberty to urge all their contentions before the Trial Court.
4. The Trial Court is directed to dispose of the matter at the earliest.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
CR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15