Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10151/2024 of MADAN N Vs STATE BY on 25 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010472832024 NC: 2026:KHC:53445 CRL.P No. 10151 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10151 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MADAN N S/O NANJAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10151 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
MADAN N
S/O NANJAIAH
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT NO. 1688, 10TH CROSS,
ASHOKAPURAM, MYSURU
2.
CHIDANANDA C
S/O CHIKKASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
R/AT NO. 1894, 6TH CROSS,
ASHOKAPURAM, MYSURU
3.
KEERTHIRAJ
S/O HEMANNA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT NO.1688, CH 22/2, 10TH CROSS,
ASHOKAPURAM, MYSURU
4.
SURESH B
S/O BASAVARAJU
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
R/AT NO. 2018, 9TH CROSS,
ASHOKAPURAM, MYSURU
5.
ADARSHA.C
S/O. CHIKKASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/AT 1594, 6TH CROSS,
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
ASHOKAPURAM MYSURU
6.
SHARATH.J.R.
S/O JAVARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
R/AT NO. 2141, CH 14, 1ST CROSS,
ASHOKAPURAM, MYSURU
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. DINAKAR M.P, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. SOMARJUNA V.M, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
STATE BY
VIDYARANYAPURAM
POLICE STATION MYSURU
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AT CR.NO.31/2024 FILED
BY THE VIDYARANYAPURAM POLICE MYSURU, UNDER SECTION
353, 332, 510, 341, 504, 506, 143, 144, 149 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the
HC-KAR
same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5