Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/2900/2024 of SILVIA SHREE RAMESHWARI Vs STATE BY INDIRANAGAR POLICE on 25 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010166222024 NC: 2026:KHC:53450 CRL.P No. 2900 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2900 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SILVIA SHREE RAMESHWARI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS FLAT NO
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010166222024
NC: 2026:KHC:53450
CRL.P No. 2900 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2900 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SILVIA SHREE RAMESHWARI
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
FLAT NO FFB, 2ND FLOOR
GEO RESIDENCY, LAKAVERI LAYOUT
AMRUTHAHALLI, BANGALURU 92
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KUMARA SWAMY N, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE BY INDIRANAGAR POLICE
BENGALURU, REPRENTED BY THE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, BENGALUORU-560001
2.
MOHAN S.P
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
S/O SAMPATH KUMAR
#32, GROUND FLOOR
4TH CROSS, JYOTHI NAGAR
2ND STAGE, DODDABETTAHALLI
BENGALURU CITY-560097
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY 1ST RESPONDENT IN
C.C.NO.52636/2024
FILED
BY
THE
1ST
RESPONDENT
INDIRANAGAR POLICE FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010166222024
NC: 2026:KHC:53450
CRL.P No. 2900 of 2024
323,384,504 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED X
ADDL.C.M.M COURT MAYO HALL BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for seventh time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2