Karnataka High Court
WP/35339/2024 of SMT SAVITRI Vs SMT SHANKARAMMA on 25 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010712952024 NC: 2026:KHC:53315 WP No. 35339 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 35339 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SAVITRI W/O. LATE. MANOHAR, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION NO. 35339 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. SAVITRI
W/O. LATE. MANOHAR,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 489,
4TH MAIN, KAMALANAGAR,
BANGALORE 560 079.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAMESHA H.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. SHANKARAMMA
W/O. JAYARAM,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
2.
SMT. SUJATHA,
W/O NOT KNOWN,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
3.
SMT. VEDA,
W/O. NOT KNOWN,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
P.I.D. NO.16-70-551, MUNICIPAL NO.551,
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA B S
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
4TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN,
KAMALANAGAR, BANGALORE-79.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ORDER OR
DIRECTION TO THE XLII ADDL. CIVIL COURT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, FOR THE EARLY DISPOSAL OF THE OS NO. 3669/2020
WITHIN A STIPULATED TIME.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The limited prayer in the present writ petition is to direct the trial Court to dispose of O.S.No.3669/2020 expeditiously.
2. The suit is one for declaration and possession. It is submitted that the suit is presently at the stage of cross- examination of the plaintiff’s witness.
3. On perusal of the order sheet, this Court finds no justifiable reason for the delay in adjudication of the suit. In
HC-KAR
that view of the matter, this Court is inclined to make limited interference.
4. The trial Court is directed to expedite the disposal of O.S.No.3669/2020 and conclude the same within a period of eighteen months' from the next date of hearing, avoiding unnecessary adjournments.
With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21