Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/1452/2020 of SRI T L KEMPARAJU Vs BEERESHA B on 25 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010538712019 NC: 2026:KHC:53191 CRL.P No. 1452 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1452 OF 2020 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T.L. KEMPARAJU, S/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1452 OF 2020
(482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. T.L. KEMPARAJU,
S/O LINGARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
PROPRIETORS
SRI PADMAVATHI VENKATESHWARA,
CHITS PVT LTD SHOP NO 2,
ANJANA NAGAR
VISHWANEEDAM POST,
MAGADI MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SMT. SUJATHA,
W/O T.L. SOMASHEKAR,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
PROPRIETORS
SRI PADMAVATHI VENKATESHWARA,
CHITS PVT LTD SHOP NO 2,
ANJANA NAGAR,
VISHWANEEDAM POST,
MAGADI MAIN ROAD,
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KEMPARAJU, ADVOCATE,
VIDE ORDER DATED 27.09.2021 HE HAS
GIVEN NOC TO PETITIONER)
AND:
BEERESHA B,
S/O BEERAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
RESIDING AT NO 57/1,
4TH CROSS, H.P. GODOWN,
ANJANAGARA, VISHWANEEDAM POST,
BENGALURU - 560 091.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C BY
THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS
HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.4585/2019 PENDING ON THE FILE
OF THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU FOR THE
OFFENCE U/S.138 OF NI ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This Court vide order dated 29.10.2021, when a submission was made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he had given NOC to his client for engaging another counsel, the petitioner was permitted one more opportunity to engage the counsel.
Though the said order was passed on 29.10.2021, till date the petitioner has not made any arrangement to
HC-KAR
engage a new counsel. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter as the petitioner has not taken any steps from 2021 till 2026. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8