Karnataka High Court
RP/466/2025 of H RANGASWAMY ANAND Vs NKGSB CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD on 25 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010692302025 NC: 2026:KHC:53197 RP No. 466 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV REVIEW PETITION NO. 466 OF 2025 BETWEEN: H RANGASWAMY ANAND S/O T.S. RANGASWAMY NAIDU, AGED 62
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
REVIEW PETITION NO. 466 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
H RANGASWAMY ANAND
S/O T.S. RANGASWAMY NAIDU,
AGED 62 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 82/42,
2ND FLOOR 1ST MAIN,
1ST CROSS, NEAR ULLAL SIGNAL,
ULLAL MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 056.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A VIJAYA SAI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
NKGSB CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,
SESHADRIPURAM BRANCH NO.173,
1ST MAIN ROAD, SESHADRIPURAM,
BENGALURU - 560 020,
REP BY ITS MANAGER.
2.
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER
AND CHIEF MANAGER,
NKGSB CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,
SESHADRIPURAM BRANCH NO.173,
1ST MAIN ROAD, SESHADRIPURAM,
BENGALURU - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
Digitally
signed by
PRAKASH N
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII
RULE 1 AND SECTION 114 OF CPC, 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW
THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DATED 28.08.2025 PASSED IN W.P.NO.16535/2025 BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
ORAL ORDER
The order dated 18.09.2026 reads as follows:
"There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called out.
It is noticed that when the matter was called out on 07.09.2026 as well, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Noticing that the present petition is a review petition and there is no representation when the matter is called out, it is made clear, if the counsel for petitioner remains absent on the next date, the Court would pass appropriate orders.
List this matter in the 'Orders' list under the caption 'For Dismissal' on 25.09.2026."
HC-KAR
2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called out. The petitioner does not appear to be diligent in prosecuting the proceedings.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE MCR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 18