Karnataka High Court
WP/8908/2023 of SRI. DODDARANGAPPA Vs SRI. M PRASANNA KUMAR on 25 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010197982023 NC: 2026:KHC:53395 WP No. 8908 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 8908 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. DODDARANGAPPA S/O RANGANNA, AGED
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010197982023
NC: 2026:KHC:53395
WP No. 8908 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 8908 OF 2023 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. DODDARANGAPPA
S/O RANGANNA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KURUNDI VILLAGE,
HOSSUR HOBLI, GOURIBIDANUR TALUK,
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-561 210.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KISHAN G S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. M PRASANNA KUMAR
S/O T G MALLESHANNA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
RESIDING AT HOSSUR VILLAGE,
HOSSUR HOBLI,, GOURIBIDANUR TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-561 210.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VASANTHA LAKSHMI H V, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTION GRANTING
AN ORDER OF INJUNCTION RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENT
FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND
ENJOYMENT OF THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN OS NO.
35/2023 PENDING BEFORE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC GOWRIBIDANUR VIDE ANNX-L.
Digitally Signed By:
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Verified
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010197982023
NC: 2026:KHC:53395
WP No. 8908 of 2023
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 25.09.2026 seeking permission of this Court to dismiss the petition as withdrawn as the parties have resolved the issue amicably.
2. The said memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the above said memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40
Digitally Signed By: SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM Verified