Karnataka High Court
WP/30223/2026 of SMT.RATHNAMMA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 25 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010659572026 NC: 2026:KHC:53199 WP No. 30223 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 30223 OF 2026 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT.RATHNAMMA W/O LATE JAYARAMA, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO. 30223 OF 2026 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT.RATHNAMMA
W/O LATE JAYARAMA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/AT 58, 10TH CROSS,
NEAR SAPNA BAR, HONGASANDRA,
BOMMANAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560068.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KUMARASWAMY B.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU 560001.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER,
SURVEY, SETTLEMENT AND LAND RECORDS,
K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. ASHVINI PATIL, AGA)
Digitally
signed by
PRAKASH N
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
ENDORSEMENT
DATED
03.08.2017
BEARING
NO.
NQ.SSLR/EST/15024/15/2017 BY RESPONDENT 2, PRODUCED
AS ANNEXURE-L, INSOFAR AS THE SAME REJECTS THE
PETITIONER'S CLAIM FOR CORRECTION OF HER DATE OF
BIRTH AND ETC.,
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present petition is filed by a government servant. In light of availability of substantive remedy before the Tribunal, no extraordinary grounds are made out to interfere in the matter at this stage.
2. It is noticed that the endorsement is of the year 2017. Accordingly, the petitioner having approached this Court belatedly, no case is made out for entertaining of the writ petition, while liberty is reserved to the petitioner to agitate rights in substantive proceedings before the
HC-KAR
Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, as is permissible in law.
3. The observations made herein are not to be construed as an adjudication of rights of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the petition is rejected. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE MCR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10