Karnataka High Court
WP/12611/2024 of MR KASHIF Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 25 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010212782024 NC: 2026:KHC:53340 WP No. 12611 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.PRAMOD WRIT PETITION NO.12611 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. KASHIF S/O. C. RAHMATHULLA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.PRAMOD
WRIT PETITION NO.12611 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
MR. KASHIF
S/O. C. RAHMATHULLA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R/AT NO.10, 3RD CROSS
HUTCHINS ROAD
BENGALURU-560 084
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI MAHADEVAIAH K. B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
2.
THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY
FOR - M/S. AALA VENTURES LTD.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (URBAN)
BENGALURU, KANDAYA BHAVAN
BENGALURU-560 009
3.
M/S. AALA VENTURES LTD.,
REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES
ACT, 1955, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.403
3RD FLOOR, 5TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN
1ST STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, H. B. R. LAYOUT
KALYAN NAGAR POST
Digitally signed
by
SHARADAVANI
B
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BENGALURU-560 043
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
MR. NADIM AHMED
4.
MR. NADIM AHMED
S/O. LATE NISAR AHMED
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
NO.403, 3RD FLOOR
5TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN
1ST STAGE, 3RD BLOCK
H.B.R. LAYOUT
KALYAN NAGAR POST
BENGALURU-560 043
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA, A.G.A. FOR R-1, SRI R. S. BUDIHAL, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 25.11.2022 PASSED BY THE
XCI
ADDITIONAL
CITY
CIVIL
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
BENGALURU (CCH-92) IN MISC. NO.27/2022 ATTACHMENT
MADE ABSOLUTE IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER SCHEDULE
PROPERTY AT ANNEXURE-H1 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER
ARE CONCERNED.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.PRAMOD
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present petition is filed calling in question the impugned order dated 25.11.2022 passed by learned XCI Additional City Civil and sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-
92) in Misc. No.27/2022.
2. Heard Sri. Veeresh Budihal, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2-competent authority.
3. Learned counsel appearing for second respondent-competent authority submits that against the impugned order, the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious statutory remedy under Section 16 of the Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004, which is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Hence, the present writ petition cannot be entertained. Needless to mention the period spent in the present case, the petitioner would be entitled for calculating period of limitation.
HC-KAR
Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to avail statutory remedy, if so advised.
Hence, writ petition stands dismissed.
Sd/- (B.PRAMOD) JUDGE
BSV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5