Karnataka High Court

WP/24037/2026 of SRI.JAYAPRAKASH K Vs SMT.NEETHA K S on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010522372026 NC: 2026:KHC:53162 WP No. 24037 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 24037 OF 2026 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI.JAYAPRAKASH K AGED 41 YEARS, S/O LATE

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010522372026

NC: 2026:KHC:53162

WP No. 24037 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

WRIT PETITION NO. 24037 OF 2026 (GM-FC)

BETWEEN:

SRI.JAYAPRAKASH K

AGED 41 YEARS,

S/O LATE BHASKARA K,

R/AT ALAMKUDLU HOUSE,

NEKRAJE POST AND VILLAGE,

KASARAGOD TALUK - 671 543

PRESENTLY R/AT JALLIGUDDE,

PADIL, MANGALORE,

DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575 007

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. AKSHAY KUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT.NEETHA K S

AGED 36 YEARS,

D/O SHIVAJI RAO,

R/AT 2-38(1), GOBBALIKE HOUSE,

ELATHURU POST AND VILLAGE,

MANGALORE - 574 150.

…RESPONDENT

(RESPONDENT IS SERVED)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 PRAYING TO 1. ISSUE

WRIT

OF

CERTIORARI

QUASHING

THE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

DATED

Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010522372026 NC: 2026:KHC:53162 WP No. 24037 of 2026

27/06/2026 ON IA NO.II IN CRL.MISC NO.6/2026 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MANGALORE DIRECTING THE PETITIONER TO PAY INTERIM MAINTENANCE OF 18,000/- PER MONTH TO THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE -G ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

ORAL ORDER

A memo has been filed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner stating that the matter has been settled between the parties. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.

2. The memo is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead