Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/10369/2024 of LOKESH KUMAR G Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010532292024 NC: 2026:KHC:53446 CRL.P No. 10369 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10369 OF 2024 BETWEEN: LOKESH KUMAR G S/O. GAJENDRA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10369 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

LOKESH KUMAR G

S/O. GAJENDRA,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO. 9/18,

12TH CROSS, K. P. AGRAHARA,

BHUVANESHWARINAGAR,

BANGALORE-560 023.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. BHADRAGOUDAR VEERABHADRA GOUDA, ADVOCATE)

(ABSENT))

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY

STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT BUILDING,

BANGALORE-560 001,

THROUGH CHANDRA LAYOUT

POLICE STATION, BENGALURU.

2.

SMT. MYTHRI M BHARDWAJ

W/O. LOKESH KUMAR. G,

AGED ABOUT MAJOR,

RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 201,

2ND FLOOR, RR RESIDENCY,

NGEF MAIN ROAD,

Digitally signed

by PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

NAGARABHAVI,

BENGALURU-560072.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. JAVEED. S, HCGP FOR R1)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528

BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED

AGAINST

THE

PETITIONER

AS

PER

ANNEXURE-C

IN

C.C.NO.7262/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE XLVI ACMM

COUR, AT BANGALORE.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.

2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.

HC-KAR

3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.

SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead