Karnataka High Court
RSA/152/2026 of D RANGASWAMY Vs MARIYANNA on 25 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010060192026 NC: 2026:KHC:53323 RSA No. 152 of 2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 152 OF 2026 (INJ) BETWEEN: D.RANGASWAMY S/O KAMBADARANGANNA, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 152 OF 2026 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
D.RANGASWAMY
S/O KAMBADARANGANNA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF DODDAGOLLA VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT,
PIN CODE-572 137.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. B.S.BASAVARAJU., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
MARIYANNA
S/O ERAMARIYANNA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF DODDAGOLLA VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT,
PIN CODE-572 137.
…RESPONDENT
THIS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.10.2025 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.27/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC, SIRA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.06.2024 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.177/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND
JMFC, SIRA.
THIS
RSA,
COMING
ON
FOR
ADMISSION,
THIS
DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by
SUMATHY KANNAN
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. This appeal has been filed seeking to challenge a judgment dated 15.10.2025 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Sira, in R.A.No.27/2024 [hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned Judgment”]. By the Impugned Judgment, the appeal filed against a decree dated 01.06.2024, passed in O.S.No.177/2021 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Sira, has been dismissed.
2. Despite the matter being called out twice, there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant.
3. There was no appearance on behalf of the appellant on the last 2 dates of hearing either and the following orders were passed: On 06.08.2026: “On behalf of the appellant time prayed on the ground of ill health of arguing counsel.
Re-list on 02.09.2026.”
On 02.09.2026:
HC-KAR
“None appears for appellant. List this matter on 25.09.2026.”
5. It seems that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Given the fact that the appellant is not appearing in the matter, the appeal is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. All pending application(s) shall stand closed.
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
BMV*/JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5