Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/13622/2024 of SRI AMJAD KHAN Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010673922024 NC: 2026:KHC:53447 CRL.P No. 13622 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13622 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI AMJAD KHAN S/O. KALEELULLA KHAN, AGED ABOUT

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13622 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI AMJAD KHAN

S/O. KALEELULLA KHAN,

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

2.

SRI WAJID

S/O. MIYANJI KHALID,

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

3.

SRI SYED MOSIN

S/O. SYED HIMAYUN,

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

4.

SRI NAVEED

S/'O. MIYANJI KHALID,

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

5.

SRI HEENA KAUSER

D/O. MIYANJI KHALID,

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,

6.

SRI HEJAS KHAN

S/O. KALEELULLA KHAN,

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

R/AT. NO.1583-2, JABBAR LANE,

DODDANNA NAGAR, 'E' BLOCK,

D.J. HALLI, BANGALORE-560 045.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. KUMARASWAMY N, ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed by

PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

D.J. HALLI POLICE STATION,

BENGALURU. REPRESENTED BY

SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

BENGALURU-01

2.

SMT. BIBI FATHIMA

D/O. MUBARAK,

AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,

R/AT NEAR VINAYAK THEATRE

TANGAMALAI NAGAR, DJ HALLI

BENGALURU-560 045

3.

SRI HUSSAIN

D/O. MUBARAK,

AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,

R/AT NEAR VINAYAK THEATRE

TANGAMALAI NAGAR, DJ HALLI

BENGALURU-560 045.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS)

PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.267/2024, PENDING IN

THE COURT OF 11th ACMM AT BENGALURU, FOR THE

OFFENCES P/U/S 506, 341,34,504,323 AND 324 OF IPC, VIDE

ANNEXURE-A.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.

HC-KAR

2. Though this matter is posted for tenth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.

3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.

SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead