Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/566/2024 of SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 25 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010029192024 NC: 2026:KHC:53449 CRL.P No. 566 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 566 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR S/O LATE M.S PRABHU SWAMY AGED
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010029192024
NC: 2026:KHC:53449
CRL.P No. 566 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 566 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR
S/O LATE M.S PRABHU SWAMY
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/AT 94/1, VETERINARY HOSPITAL ROAD,
KOTE, TIPTUR RURAL, TUMAKURU-572201
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ELAM PARUTTI.G FOR
SRI. S. NAGARAJA S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY VIGILANCE POLICE STATION
BESCOM TUMKUR
REP BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING PREMISES
BANGALORE-560001
2.
SRI. A. ATHAVULLA
AEEE(E) VIGILANCE POLICE STATION,
BESCOM, INDIRANAGARA
BANGALORE-560 038
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1,
R2 NOTICE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.186/2023 FOR THE
ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 135(1)(e) OF INDIAN ELECTRICITY
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010029192024
NC: 2026:KHC:53449
CRL.P No. 566 of 2024
ACT
WHICH
IS
PENDING
ON
THE
FILE
OF
THE
I
ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to place all the documents which he relied on in this petition, as his defence, before the investigation officer.
2. The submission is accepted and taken on record.
3. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to place all the documents he relied on in this petition, before the investigation officer as his defence within two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14