Karnataka High Court
WP/28078/2026 of SMT.KRISHNAMMA Vs SMT.PILLAMMA on 24 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010615152026 NC: 2026:KHC:52977 WP No. 28078 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 28078 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.KRISHNAMMA DAUGHTER OF LATE. MUNIYAPPA
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION NO. 28078 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT.KRISHNAMMA
DAUGHTER OF LATE. MUNIYAPPA
GRAND DAUGHTER OF LATE. CHIKKATHAYAMMA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.164/4,
1ST MAIN ROAD, MUNESHWARA BLOCK,
CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI, R.T.NAGAR POST,
BENGLAURU-560032
AADHAR No. 8062 1340 7892
2.
SRI.C.M.RAMACHANDRA
SON OF LATE.MUNIYAPPA
GRANDSON OF LATE. CHIKKATHAYAMMA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.01, SHREE SAI NIVAS,
SEETHAPPA LAYOUT, CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI,
R.T.NAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560032
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KRISHNA MURTHY T. R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT.PILLAMMA
WIFE OF LATE.MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS,
AADHAR NO.3326 9264 0956
RESIDING AT NO.164, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
MUNESHWARA BLOCK, CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI,
RT NAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560032
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA B S
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. HEMAVATHI
DAUGHTER OF LATE.MUNIYAPPA
GRAND DAUGHTER OF LATE. CHIKKATHAYAMMA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.307, TANK BUND ROAD,
YELAHANKA, BENGLAURU-560064
AADHAR NO.9430 3785 7267
3.
SRI.C.M.RAMESH
SON OF LATE. MUNIYAPPA
GRAND SON OF LATE. CHIKKATHAYAMMA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.59, SHREE SAI NIVAS,
CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI, R.T.NAGAR POST,
BENGALURU-560032
AADHAR No.9821 3793 6996
4.
SMT. LALITHAMMA
WIFE OF CHANDRAMOULI,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KAIKONDARAHALLI VILLAGE,
VARTHUR HOBLI, CARMELARAM POST,
SARJAPURA ROAD, BENGLAURU-560035
5.
SMT. MANGALAGOWRI,
WIFE OF LATE.K.S.RUDRAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 65YEARS,
6.
SRI.K.R.MANJUNATHA
SON OF LATE.K.S.RUDRAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
7.
SRI.K.R.VISHWANATHA
SON OF LATE.K.S.RUDRAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
8.
SRI.NANJUNDAPPA
SON OF LATE.K.L.SHIVANNA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
HC-KAR
9.
SMT. RAJESHWARI
WIFE OF LATE.SOMASHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
10.
SRI. VIDYA SHANKAR
SON OF LATE.SOMASHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
11.
SRI. VIVEK
SON OF LATE.SOMASHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
12.
SRI.JAGADISH
SON OF LATE.K.L.SHIVANNA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
13.
SRI.RAJENDRA @ RAJANNA
SON OF LATE.K.L.SHIVANNA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
14.
SRI. VIJAYKUMAR
SON OF LATE.K.L.SHIVANNA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
THE RESPONDENT No.5 TO 12 ARE
RESIDING AT No.32,
KAIKONDANAHALLI VILLAGE,
VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK,
BENGALURU-560035.
15.
SMT.PUTTAGOWRAMMA
WIFE OF NANJUNDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.2/2 (222),
21ST MAIN ROAD, SRINIVASANAGAR,
NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGLAURU.
…RESPONDENTS
(NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS IS DISPENSED WITH)
HC-KAR
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE
IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED ON I A NO.1 DATED 10.08.2026 IN
O.S.NO.5800/2026, (ANNEXURE A) AND THEREBY ALLOW THE
APPLICATION IN I A NO.1 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS UNDER
ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE
CODE CIVIL PROCEDURE, BEFORE THE HON'BLE LEARNED IX
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE (CCH-5), AT
BENGALURU, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners instituted a suit for partition in O.S. No.5800/2026, along with I.A. No.1/2026 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’), seeking an ex-parte ad- interim temporary injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the suit schedule property or creating any interest therein. The Trial Court, by the impugned order, issued notice on I.A. No.1/2026 as well as on the suit.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the defendants are attempting to alienate the suit schedule property with a view to deprive the petitioners of their
HC-KAR
rights and that, if they are not restrained, such alienation would result in multiplicity of proceedings and creation of third-party rights.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. Perused the pleadings and considered the limited relief that can be granted by this Court. In view thereof, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with.
5. The suit is one for partition. Pending adjudication of the rights of the parties, it would be appropriate to maintain the status quo in respect of the suit schedule property. Undoubtedly, if any alienation is permitted, it may result in multiplicity of proceedings and also prejudice the rights of the parties.
6. In that view of the matter, both the parties are directed to maintain status quo in respect of the suit schedule property till consideration of I.A. No.1/2026 filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC.
HC-KAR
7. The Trial Court is directed to consider the said application within a period of six weeks from the next date of hearing, which is scheduled on 29.09.2026. The petitioners are directed to place a copy of this order before the Trial Court on the next date of hearing.
8. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29