Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/8247/2019 of SHRI THOLASIRAMA Vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010464692019 NC: 2026:KHC:53136 CRL.P No. 8247 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8247 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SHRI THOLASIRAMA S/O BODKA NAIK AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010464692019

NC: 2026:KHC:53136

CRL.P No. 8247 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8247 OF 2019

BETWEEN:

1.

SHRI THOLASIRAMA

S/O BODKA NAIK

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

R/O NO.91, 3RD CROSS

TELECOM LAYOUT

K P AGRAHARA, VIJAYANAGAR

BANGALORE-560040

2.

SMT. H SARADA

W/O THOLASIRAMA

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

R/O NO.91, 3RD CROSS

TELECOM LAYOUT

K P AGRAHARA, VIJAYANAGAR

BANGALORE-560040

…PETITIONERS

(BY MS. VIJETHA R NAIK, ADVOCATE [NOC])

AND:

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

REP. BY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

DEPT. OF REVENUE

3RD FLOOR, ‘B’ BLOCK

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010464692019

NC: 2026:KHC:53136

CRL.P No. 8247 of 2019

BMTC, SHANTHINAGAR

K H ROAD

BENGALURU-560027

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI JAYAKARA SHETTY H, ADVOCATE)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO

QUASH THE ORDER DATED 24.10.2019 PASSED BY THE XXI

ADDITIONAL

CITY

CIVIL

AND

SESSIONS

JUDGE

AND

PRL.SPL.JUDGE

FOR

CBI

CASES,

BENGALURU

IN

SPL.C.C.NO.310/2017 AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the challenge is made with regard to recording of evidence before the charge. Now, already charge has been framed by the Trial Court. Hence, the present petition has become infructuous. The said submission is taken on record. In view of the said submission, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

SN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead