Karnataka High Court
CCC/94/2023 of SMT KUMUDA Vs SRI SHEENA on 24 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010051812023 NC: 2026:KHC:52847-DB CCC No. 94 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 94 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 94 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. KUMUDA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
W/O LATE SRI JEEVANDHAR KUMAR
2.
SRI SUVEERA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
S/O LATE SRI. JEEVANDHAR KUMAR
3.
SMT. SAVITHA
D/O LATE SRI JEEVANDHAR KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
4.
SRI SANTHOSH
S/O LATE SRI JEEVANDHAR KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING NEAR
MANJUNATHASWAMY KALYANA MANTAP
JAYALAKSHMIPURAM
MYSURU
REPRESENTED BY THEIR
POWER OF ATTORNEY
SRI RAGHUCHANDRA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS
S/O LATE SRI KUMARAYYA SHETTY
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B K
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NEAR THOUSAND PILLAR TEMPLE
MOODABIDIRI -574 227
MANGALURU TALUK, D.K.
…COMPLAINANTS
(BY SRI. K CHANDRANATH ARIGA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI SHEENA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
S/O LATE SHIVAMMA @ APPI
R/A PADYOTTU
POST: NELLIKAR - 574 107
NALLUR VILLAGE
KARKALA TALUK
UDUPI DISTRICT.
…ACCUSED
(BY SRI. S.N. PRASHANTH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE
CONSTITUTION
OF
INDIA,
PRAYING
TO
INITIATE
THE
CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND
PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER
DATED 10.10.2017 IN W.P.NO.44408/2017 (LR-RES).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience/non compliance of the order dated 10.10.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.44408/2017 (LR-RES) filed by the appellants herein.
2. On notice the alleged contemnor is represented by Sri S.N. Prashanth Chandra.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the alleged contemnor submits that insofar as the land in Sy.No.316/1A2 measuring an extent of 0.63 cents situated in Nallur Village, Karkala Taluk, Udupi District is concerned, status quo as granted by the learned Single Judge on 10.10.2017 is maintained he has not planted any plants on the said land after the order of status quo. He further undertakes that he will maintain the status quo till the disposal of the writ petition.
4. However, the contemnor shall be entitled to maintain the plants/trees by watering and also taking care of the plants. However, this will not enure any benefit in favour of the
HC-KAR
contemnor and the rights over the property in question would be subject to the final outcome of the writ petition.
5. With the aforesaid observation, this contempt proceedings are dropped.
6. Contempt notice stands discharged.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE
NG CT:SM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7