Karnataka High Court

MFA/4103/2020 of SMT. SHANTHAMMA Vs RAMALINGAIAH on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010173092020 NC: 2026:KHC:52968 MFA No. 4103 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4103 OF 2020 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHANTHAMMA, W/O LATE H.

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4103 OF 2020

(MV-D)

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. SHANTHAMMA,

W/O LATE H. LAKSHMINARASAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE,

I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK,

TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132.

2.

MURALI L.,

S/O LATE H. LAKSHMANARASAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE,

I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK,

TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132.

3.

VENU L.,

S/O LATE H. LAKSHMANARASAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS

RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE,

I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK,

TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132.

4.

YOGAANDA,

S/O LATE H. LAKSHMANARASAPPA,

Digitally

signed by

SUSHMA

LAKSHMI B

S

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,

RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE,

I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK,

TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. PATEL D. KARE GOWDA., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

RAMALINGAIAH,

S/O KADARAPPA,

AGE ABOUT 37 YEARS,

R/O NEERAKALLU VILLAGE,

MIDIGESHI HOBLI,

MADHUGIRI TALUK,

TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132.

…RESPONDENT

----

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.11.2019, PASSED IN

MVC.NO.1483/2018, ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MADHUGIRI, PARTLY

ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND

SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Case called out.

2. No representation for the parties.

3. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead