Karnataka High Court
MFA/4103/2020 of SMT. SHANTHAMMA Vs RAMALINGAIAH on 24 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010173092020 NC: 2026:KHC:52968 MFA No. 4103 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4103 OF 2020 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHANTHAMMA, W/O LATE H.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4103 OF 2020
(MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. SHANTHAMMA,
W/O LATE H. LAKSHMINARASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE,
I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132.
2.
MURALI L.,
S/O LATE H. LAKSHMANARASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE,
I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132.
3.
VENU L.,
S/O LATE H. LAKSHMANARASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE,
I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132.
4.
YOGAANDA,
S/O LATE H. LAKSHMANARASAPPA,
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE,
I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. PATEL D. KARE GOWDA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
RAMALINGAIAH,
S/O KADARAPPA,
AGE ABOUT 37 YEARS,
R/O NEERAKALLU VILLAGE,
MIDIGESHI HOBLI,
MADHUGIRI TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132.
…RESPONDENT
----
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.11.2019, PASSED IN
MVC.NO.1483/2018, ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MADHUGIRI, PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND
SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Case called out.
2. No representation for the parties.
3. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1