Karnataka High Court
CRP/886/2025 of P NARENDRA PRASAD Vs ADITYA PRABHU JAGANNATH on 24 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010772692025 NC: 2026:KHC:53047 CRP No. 886 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 886 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: P.NARENDRA PRASAD S/O LATE M.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 886 OF 2025 (IO)
BETWEEN:
P.NARENDRA PRASAD
S/O LATE M. PUTTEGOWDA,
72 YEARS,
RESIDING AT FARM HOUSE,
SY. NO. 50/A-6, DABBEGATTA VILLAGE,
KIKKERI HOBLI, K.R. PET TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT -571 423
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BHAGAVAN S.G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
ADITYA PRABHU JAGANNATH
S/O LATE JAGANNATH,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.16234,
CHATMAN DRIVE, STRONG VILLE,
OHIO - 44149,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ALSO AT
SHREE PEETHA NILAYA,
ZENTRUM, HEIDENROD –
GERMANY.
REPRESENTED BY HIS
GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR. K. JAYAKUMAR
S/O LATE A.V. KRISHNA,
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO 24,
3RD CROSS, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM,
MYSURU - 570 012
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SURYANSH NAIDU A., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
ORDER DATED 15.11.2025 PASSED ON IA NO.X IN OS
NO.23/2016 ON THE FILE OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
JMFC, AT KRISHNARAJAPET, DISMISSING IA NO.X FILED
UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF
PLAINT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present Civil Revision petition is filed questioning the order dated 15.11.2025 passed in I.A.No.X in O.S.No.23/2016 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Krishnarajapet, whereby the trial Court rejected the plaint.
HC-KAR
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/defendant submits that there are certain subsequent events, including an order in which the Hon'ble Apex Court directed the trial court to expedite the hearing and disposal of the suit within a period of one week. Further, the respondent herein, who is the plaintiff, has filed an application under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC seeking an amendment to the plaint, which was allowed. It is submitted that, in view of these subsequent developments, the Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed as not pressed.
3. In light of the fact that the plaint has already been amended, there is no necessity to go into the legality or otherwise of this matter and in the light of the directions issued by the Hon'ble Apex Court, both the parties shall proceed with the trial. Hence, this Court is passing the following:
ORDER
i. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
ii. This Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the matter.
HC-KAR
iii. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24 *AK