Karnataka High Court
CCC/393/2025 of MRS. NASREEN THAJ Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 24 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010228722025 NC: 2026:KHC:52922-DB CCC No. 393 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 393 OF 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 393 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
MRS. NASREEN THAJ
W/O LATE SYED MASTHAN,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT: NO.64, DARGHAMOHALLA
VIJANAPURA, DOORVANINAGAR POST,
BENGALURU - 560 016.
2.
MRS. SHAMA SULTHANA M
D/O LATE SYED MASTHAN,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
R/AT NO.64, DARGHAMOHALLA,
VIJANAPURA, DOORVANINAGAR POST,
BENGALURU-560 016.
3.
MR. SYED MUZAMMIL M
S/O LATE SYED MASTHAN
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
R/ AT NO.64, DARGHAMOHALLA,
VIJANAPURA, DOORVANINAGAR POST,
BENGALURU-560 016.
4.
MR. SYED ABRAR
S/O LATE SYED MASTHAN
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
R/AT NO.64, DARGHAMOHALLA,
VIJANAPURA, DOORVANINAGAR POST,
…COMPLAINANTS
(BY SRI.N.S.SRIRAJ GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
SUMATHY KANNAN
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…PROFORMA RESPONDENT
2.
SRI. AKRAM PASHA
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
KOLAR SUB-DIVISON,
KOLAR DISTRICT,
KOLAR-563 101.
3.
SMT. VENKETLAKSHMI
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
KOLAR SUB-DIVISION
KOLAR DISTRICT
KOLAR-563 101.
4.
SMT. GEETHA,
THE TAHSILDAR,
MULBAGAL TALUK,
MULBAGAL,
KOLAR-563 131.
…ACCUSED
(BY SMT. B.SUMANA BALIGA, AGA
FOR PROFORMA RESPONDENT AND A2 TO A4)
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS
11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT AND RULE 3 OF THE
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS)
RULES 1981, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO ORDER THAT, ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4 ARE GUILTY OF CONTEMPT OF THE ORDER
DATED
31.08.2023
PASSED
BY
THIS
HON'BLE
COURT
IN
W.P.NO.50772/2014 (KLR-RR/SUR) PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
and
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
Heard the learned counsel for the complainants and the learned AGA appearing for the proforma respondent and accused Nos.2 to 4.
2. The wilful disobedience of the order dated 31.08.2023 passed in Writ Petition No.50772/2014 is alleged. By the order of the writ Court, the following directions were made: "
22. Accordingly, the order of respondent No.4
- Tahsildar at Annexure-'G' dated 12.11.2010 passed in LND/CR/15/2008-09, the order of respondent No.3- Assistant Commissioner at Annexure-'H' dated 27.12.2013 passed in R.A.No.266/2012-13 and the order of respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner at Annexure-'J' dated 02.07.2014 passed in R.A.No.60/2013-2014 are set aside.
23. In view of setting aside of the orders of Tahsildar, Assistant Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner, the respondent Authorities to take steps to restore the names of petitioners which were deleted consequent to the impugned orders.
HC-KAR
24. Looking into the fragile nature of original records, the respondent Authorities are directed to ensure that the original records are maintained/preserved till they are digitalized eventually as contemplated by the State Authorities and for that purpose, immediate steps are to be taken to laminate/take appropriate measures to preserve the documents till digitalization is done.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed off."
3. In the compliance affidavit filed by the learned AGA, the Tahsildar Geetha V., has stated as follows:
"3. I humbly submit that, being aggrieved by the order dated 31.08.2023, the Respondent State of Karnataka filed a Writ Appeal before the Division bench of this Hon'ble court in W.A.No.258/2023. The Division bench of this Hon'ble court, was pleased to dismiss the Writ appeal filed by us on 15.04.2026. Copy of the Writ Appeal is herewith produced and marked as ANNEXURE-R1.
4. I state that as per the direction of this Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition No.50772/2014 (KLR- RR/SUR) dated 31.08.2023, the name of the Original Petitioner Syed Masthan S/o Syed Mohaboob is restored in the Revenue Records vide Mutation No.MRT24/2025-26 Dated on 09/06/2026. Copy of the
HC-KAR
same is herewith produced and marked along with English Translation as ANNEXURE-R2.
5. I state that the updated Record of Rights (RTC) dated 12/06/2026 reflecting the name of the Petitioner Syed Masthan s/o Syed Mohaboob has been generated. Copy of the RTC dated 09/06/2026 is herewith produced and marked as ANNEXURE-R3 for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court."
4. An unconditional apology has also been tendered. A copy of the compliance affidavit has already been served on the learned counsel for the complainants by e-mail on 22.09.2026. The order of writ Court, having been complied, this contempt petition is consigned.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13