Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/11911/2026 of SRI MAHESH D Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 24 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010541902026 NC: 2026:KHC:52835 CRL.P No. 11911 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11911 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI MAHESH D AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11911 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SRI MAHESH D
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
S/O DUNDAIAH,
R/AT KEMPAIAHANADODDI VILLAGE,
HALAGUR HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK,
WRONGLY MENTIONED AS BENGALURU SOUTH,
CORRECTLY IS MANDYA DISTRICT,
KARNATAKA- 571421.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M M ASHOKA.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY SATHANOOR POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU 560 001.
2.
SMT. GAYATHRI H.M,
W/O RAJU S P,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
MEMBER OF GRAM PANCHAYATH,
FORMER PRESIDENT,
SATHANOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
KANAKAPURA, BANGALORE SOUTH-562126.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI M M ASHOKA, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI NAGHARISH G S, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING
HC-KAR
THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH
THE TAKING OF COGNIZANCE AND ISSUE OF PROCESS
AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CC NO.599/2026 FOR AN
ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 352, 115(2), 118(1), 74, 351(2) OF
BNS 2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC KANAKAPURA AS MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A
AGAINST THE PETITIONERS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1-State.
2. This petition is filed to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.599/2026 for the offence punishable under Sections 352, 115(2), 118(1), 74, 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ('BNS') pending before the JMFC, Kanakapura.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner visited the police station two days after the incident to lodge a complaint against the complainant and family members. However, the police have not registered the complaint. Then the petitioner's wife has lodged the complaint
HC-KAR
on 07.12.2025 in Crime No.161/2025. The complainant is politically strong and because of the influence of the complainant, the petitioner’s wife's complaint is not yet investigated, though the petitioner is the victim.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence and a false charge sheet is filed against the petitioner.
5. Learned HCGP would submit that there is an allegation of bleeding injury near the eye as well as assault on the forehead. The complainant has gone to the hospital and taken treatment and medical certificate is produced. It is also the contention that there are eye witnesses to the alleged incident as such, the matter requires trial.
6. On a pointed question put forth by the Court as to why the report is not filed on the complaint filed by the petitioner's wife, learned HCGP would submit that appropriate report would be filed after investigation.
7. The Court has considered the contentions raised at the Bar and perused the records.
HC-KAR
8. According to the materials on record, it appears that the case is a counter case filed relating to the same incident.
9. That being the position, the Court is of the view that the matter requires trial. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
10. The respondent-State is also directed to file appropriate report on the complaint filed by the petitioner's wife registered in Crime No.161/2025 before the Sathanoor P.S., Bengaluru.
11. It is made clear that observations made in this order are not on the merits of the defence to be raised by the petitioners.
12. All contentions are kept open.
(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22