Karnataka High Court
MFA/4525/2025 of SRI M N SHIVAPRASAD Vs SMT VIMALA M D on 24 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010347042025 NC: 2026:KHC:52858-DB MFA No. 4032 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 4525 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
AND
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4032 OF 2025
C/W
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4525 OF 2025
IN MFA No. 4032/2025
BETWEEN:
SRI M N SHIVAPRASAD
S/O. NAGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT, 26, GROUND FLOOR,
6TH CROSS, II MAIN,
BLOCK NO. 16, SHAKTHINAGAR,
PRESENTLY R/AT,
MAMBALLI VILLAGE,
SUVARNAVATHI STREET, YALANDURU TALUK,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571442
PRESENTLY WORKING AS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
PWD DEPARTMENT, CHANNAPATNA,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562160
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA.H.G., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
SMT VIMALA M D
W/O. SHIVAPRASAD.M.N,
AGED ABOUT, 40 YEARS,
R/AT, 26, GROUND FLOOR, 6TH CROSS,
II MAIN, BLOCK NO. 16, SHAKTHINAGAR,
ALSO AT,
NO.23, GROUND FLOOR, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
3RD CROSS ROAD, BLOCK NO.16,
JSS LAYOUT, SHAKTHI NAGARA
MYSURU-57002
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. BHAT GANAPATHI NARAYANA., ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.04.2025
PASSED IN MC NO. 193/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE I
ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1)(i- a)(i-b) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT WITH EXEMPLARY COST
OF RS. 10,000/- TO THE RESPONDENT AND ETC., IN MFA NO. 4525/2025
BETWEEN:
SRI M N SHIVAPRASAD
S/O. NAGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT, 26, GROUND FLOOR, 6TH CROSS,
II MAIN, BLOCK NO.16,
SHAKTHINAGAR,
HC-KAR
PRESENTLY R/AT,
MAMBALLI VILLAGE, SUVARNAVATHI STREET,
YALANDURU TALUK,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571442
PRESENTLY WORKING AS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
PWD DEPARTMENT, CHANNAPATNA,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562160
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA.H.G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT VIMALA M D
W/O. SHIVAPRASAD.M.N,
AGED ABOUT, 40 YEARS,
R/AT, 26, GROUND FLOOR,
6TH CROSS, II MAIN, BLOCK NO.16,
SHAKTHINAGAR, SATHAGALLI,
NAZARBAD MOHALLA, MYSURU-570010
ALSO AT,
NO.23, GROUND FLOOR,
2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS ROAD,
BLOCK NO.16, JSS LAYOUT,
SHAKTHI NAGARA
MYSURU-570029
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VIRUPAKSHAIAH P.H., ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.19(1) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DT.03.04.2025 PASSED IN MC NO.193/2023 ON THE FILE
OF THE I ADDITIONAL PRL. JUDGE, FMAILY COURT,
HC-KAR
MYSURU, ALLOWING THE COUNTER CLAIM SOUGHT BY
RESPONDENT FILED U/S.13(1) (i-a) (i-b) OF HINDU
MARRIAGE ACT AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
and
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS) The appellant and the respondent have filed a joint memo dated 24.09.2026 stating that with the intervention of well-wishers, elders and family members and keeping the paramount welfare and future of their two minor children as the utmost priority, the appellant and the respondent have resolved to bury all past differences and allegations. The parties have mutually agreed to reunite, reconcile and resume their matrimonial life with mutual love, affection and respect. The parties have also resolved their dispute, subject to the conditions incorporated in the joint memo.
HC-KAR
2. The appellant and the respondent are present before this court.
3. Both the parties admit that they have filed the joint memo and that they have understood the terms of the joint memo and that they will abide by the terms and conditions stated in the joint memo.
4. Accordingly, the appeals stand disposed of.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
KLY CT: JL