Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/11173/2024 of SMT MAHESWARAMMA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010568212024 NC: 2026:KHC:52940 CRL.P No. 11173 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11173 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. MAHESWARAMMA W/O. NAGARAJA. B., AGED ABOUT 56
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11173 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SMT. MAHESWARAMMA
W/O. NAGARAJA. B.,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT PNT KATRAS,
CHOLGUDDA CHITRADURGA,
CHITRADURGA, CHALLAKERE,
CHITRADURGA,
KARNATAKA-577 501.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAKSHITH K.S, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY CHITRADURGA TOWN P.S.,
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU-560 066.
2.
SRI. JAGADISH. K. S.
S/O. SOMASHEKARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
R/AT RANGAIAHNA BAGILU,
CHITRADURGA TOWN,
CHITRADURGA-577 501.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN
C.C. NO.2622/2022 ON THE FILE OF II. ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT AT CHITRADURGA FOR
THE OFFENCES P/U/S 506, 341, 504, 323 OF IPC, 1860 VIDE
ORDER SHEET AT ANNEXURE-C PERTAINING TO F.I.R BEARING
CRIME NO.69/2022 OF CHITRADURGA TOWN POLICE STATION, AT ANNEXURE-A AND COMPLAINT AT ANNEXURE-B, CHARGE
SHEET AT ANNEXURE-D WHEREIN THE PETITIONER HEREIN IS
ARRAYED AS ACCUSED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for ninth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 18