Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/14571/2026 of MR MUKESHKUMAR JAIN Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010646292026 NC: 2026:KHC:52669 CRL.P No. 14571 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14571 OF 2026 BETWEEN: MR MUKESHKUMAR JAIN, S/O KISHAN LAL, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14571 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
MR MUKESHKUMAR JAIN,
S/O KISHAN LAL,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
R/AT NO.305, 3RD FLOOR,
'H' BLOCK, MADHUBAN COMPLEX,
J.C. NAGAR, HUBBALLI - 580020,
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI ARUNA SHYAM M, SR. ADVOCATE FOR
SRI DILIPKUMAR GOWDA R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
SOUTH EAST CEN POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE - 560001.
2.
MR. MANISH KUMAR,
AGED 37 YEARS,
S/O AMARCHAND,
R/A NO.31, BEHIND MCDONALDS,
18TH CROSS ROAD, 7TH SECTOR,
HSR LAYOUT, BANGALORE,
KARNATAKA - 560102.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI M V ANOOP KUMAR, ADDL. SPP FOR R1)
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING
THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH
THE NOTICE DATED 19.08.2026 ISSUED UNDER SEC.35(3) OF
THE BNSS 2023 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-J AND THE
SUBSEQUENT NOTICE DTD 27.08.2026 ISSUED TO THE
PETITIONER UNDER SEC.35(3) OF THE BNSS 2023 PRODUCED
AS ANNEXURE-K IN CONNECTION WITH CR.NO.250/2025
REGISTERED
BY
THE
SOUTH
EAST
CEN
CRIME
P.S.
BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 318(4) AND 319(2) OF
BNS AND SEC.66(C) AND 66(D) OF I.T ACT 2000, ON THE FILE
OF THE 47TH ACJM COURT AT BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri Aruna Shyam M., the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. Learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for the first respondent.
2. This Court has perused the contents of the complaint, the grounds urged in the petition as well as the submissions by the learned senior counsel.
3. It is submitted that the complaint was filed on 09.07.2025. The petitioner, after obtaining the anticipatory bail
HC-KAR
appeared before the police to furnish surety and to complied with the bail conditions.
4. Thereafter, pursuant to the notice issued by the police the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and the petitioner was made to sit in the police station from morning till evening and the investigation is not yet completed.
5. It is further submitted that, not a single rupee is credited to the account of the petitioner as alleged. It is also submitted that the petitioner is not named in the complaint and the FIR.
6. Learned Additional SPP would submit that the offence alleged is a cyber crime. The matter requires thorough investigation.
7. It is also submitted on behalf of the respondent that the petitioner has not appeared before the police till 07.08.2026 and his first appearance was on 07.08.2026 and the investigation shall be conducted in accordance with law.
HC-KAR
8. The learned senior counsel by way of reply would submit that the petitioner has cooperated with the investigation. It is also submitted that the petitioner is resident of Hubli and the complaint is registered before South East CEN Police, Bengaluru.
9. Under these circumstances, when the petitioner appears before the police station pursuant to the notice by the Investigating Officer, the Investigating Officer shall carry out the investigation, and the petitioner/accused shall not be called to visit the police station when his presence is not required.
10. With the above observation, the petition is disposed of.
(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
CHS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8 …