Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6090/2026 of SMT. MALATHI V Vs M/S SHREYAS HIND CHITS INDIA PVT. LTD., on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010274272026 NC: 2026:KHC:52418 CRL.P No. 6090 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6090 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SMT. MALATHI V D/O SUBBANNA, SINCE DECEASED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6090 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SMT. MALATHI V
D/O SUBBANNA,
SINCE DECEASED BY HER LR,
SRI. G.VENKATESH,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
OCC BUSINESS,
R/AT NO. 199, 16TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK,
JAYANAGARA, BENGALURU
PINCODE-584103.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI CHANDRASHEKAR P PATIL,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
M/S SHREYAS HIND CHITS INDIA PVT. LTD.,
REP. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR
M. SRINIVAS, OFF. AT NO. 56/1, 3RD FLOOR, 9TH MAIN, 5TH BLOCK, OPP.
SAMSKRUTHI CONVENTION HALL,
JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 041.
2.
M. SRINIVAS
S/O MUNIPAPE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
MANAGING DIRECTOR,
M/S SHREYAS HIND CHITS INDIA PVT. LTD.,
R/AT 969, 5TH C CROSS, VIJAYA BANK LAYOUT, BEHIND IIMB, B.G. ROAD, BTM 4TH STAGE, BENGALURU-560076.
…RESPONDENTS
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING
THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09.01.2026 PASSED BY THE LD XXII
ACMM BANGALORE CITY IN CC NO.8659/2016 AND REMAND
THE
MATTER
FOR
LEADING
EVIDENCE
OF
THE
COMPLAINANT/PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the petition.
2. Memo is accepted.
3. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. It is submitted that the order is appealabe, as such, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take such action as advised in law.
5. The time spent in prosecuting this petition from 15.04.2026 till date has to be excluded while computing limitation.
HC-KAR
6. Registry shall return all the certified copies of the petition after retaining the xerox copies.
(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE GVP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12