Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/5945/2024 of SMT.VARALAKSHMAMMA Vs STATE BY KUMBALAGODU POLICE STATION on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010334742024 NC: 2026:KHC:52934 CRL.P No. 5945 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5945 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT.VARALAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010334742024
NC: 2026:KHC:52934
CRL.P No. 5945 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5945 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT.VARALAKSHMAMMA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 114,
MACHOHALLI COLONY,
KADABAGERE CROSS,
VISHWANEEDAM POST,
BANGALORE - 560091.
2.
SMT VEENA
W/O MARUTHI B,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
RESIDING AT GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE,
NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SREENIVAS R, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE BY KUMBALAGODU POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY SPP,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE - 560001.
2.
SMT MANGALAGOWRI
W/O MAHESH L,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
R/AT BHEEMANAKUPPE VILLAGE,
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010334742024
NC: 2026:KHC:52934
CRL.P No. 5945 of 2024
RAMOHALLI POST,
KENGERI HOBALI,
BENGALURU - 560074
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THIS PETITIONERS IN
CR.NO.12/2024 AND IN C.C.NO.3001/2024 PENDING BEFORE
THE
II
ADDL.C.J.M.,
BENGALURU
RURAL
DISTRICT,
BENGALURU AND AWARD THE COST OF THE PROCEEDINGS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1, on instructions, submits that the petition may be dismissed, as the proceedings sought to be challenged in the present petition have already culminated in an acquittal.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for consideration in the present petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9