Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/13509/2026 of GIRISH Vs STATE BY KENGERI POLICE on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010604482026 NC: 2026:KHC:52589 CRL.P No. 13509 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13509 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. GIRISH, S/O GANGANNA, AGED ABOUT 25
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13509 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
GIRISH,
S/O GANGANNA,
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 312, 16TH CROSS,
SRINIVASAPURA, KENGERI,
BENGALURU-560060.
2.
SHIVAPRASAD,
S/O PRABHAKAR,
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
12TH CROSS, AKKAMADEVI ROAD,
SRINIVASAPURA, KENGERI,
BENGALURU-560060.
3.
PRADEEP,
S/O. BABU,
NO. 472, 10TH CROSS, SRINIVASAPURA
COLONY, NEAR OMKARESWAR TEMPLE,
BENGALURU-560060.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI R SRINIVASA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY KENGERI POLICE,
REPTD. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU-560 001.
HC-KAR
2.
DORESWAMY,
S/O LATE BACHAYYA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
NO.1/48 EAST STREET,
KUDUPATTI VILLAGE AT POST,
MASARI TALUK, TIRUCHIRAPALLI DISTRICT,
TAMILNADU-621 211.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. G.S ARUNA, HCGP FOR R-1;
R2- SERVICE OF NOTICE IS DISPENSED WITH V.C.O.
DATED 23.09.2026)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 (FILED U/S.528 BNSS)
CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 19.08.2026
PASSED IN S.C.NO.801/2026 PENDING BEFORE HON’BLE LXIV
ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-65) AT
BENGALURU AND DIRECT THE HON’BLE ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
SESSION JUDGE (CCH-65) AT BENGALURU TO CONSIDER THE
SURETY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for the first respondent.
3. Issuance of notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with.
HC-KAR
4. This petition is filed to quash the order dated 19.08.2026 passed by the LXIV Additional Sessions Judge (CCH-65), Bengaluru, in S.C.No.801/2026, wherein the petitioners' bonds have been forfeited on the ground that they have failed to furnish the surety in terms of the order granting bail.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that there was a delay of one day in furnishing the surety as the person offering the surety was not keeping well.
6. This Court has considered the contentions raised in the petition.
7. It is evident that the impugned order is passed forfeiting the bonds executed by the petitioners, on the ground that the petitioners have not furnished surety of `50,000/- each. It is true that there is a delay in furnishing the surety.
8. However, considering the fact that the petitioners are ready to furnish the surety, though there is a delay, same can be accepted by condoning the delay for the cause shown. The
HC-KAR
petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 19.08.2026 is set aside.
9. The petitioners are directed to furnish surety as ordered in terms of the order granting bail.
10. The compliance shall be made within two weeks from today.
11. Pending I.A.No.1/2026 stands disposed, as a consequence.
(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44