Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/1319/2022 of SRI S R PUTTARADHYA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010071902022 NC: 2026:KHC:52739 CRL.P No. 1319 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1319 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. S.R. PUTTARADHYA, S/O LATE S.V. RUDYARADHYA,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1319 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. S.R. PUTTARADHYA,
S/O LATE S.V. RUDYARADHYA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/O NO.101, POLICE QUARTERS,
BARLINE ROAD, BEHIND CHILUME,
K.R. EXTENSION
TUMAKURU-572 101.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIJETHA R. NAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
THROUGH NEW EXTENSION
POLICE STATION, TUMAKURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT COMPLEX,
BENGALURU-560001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SUHAS GOWDA M., HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN
C.C.NO.9662/2021 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF
PRL. CIVIL JUDE (SR. DN) AND CJM, TUMAKURU FOR THE
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 470, 465, 420, 409,
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
408 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN
CR.NO.62/2020 INVESTIGATED BY THE TUMAKURU NEW
EXTENSION POLICE AND TO QUASH THE ORDER TAKING
COGNIZANCE PASSED BY THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE DATED
11.11.2021 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHALE UNDER SECTIONS
470, 465, 420, 409, 408 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC AS AGAINST
THE PETITIONER ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO.3 AND ALL
ACTION PURSUANT THERETO.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is going to argue on merits. Once the trial is commenced and charges are framed, the question of entertaining the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. does not arise. Inspite of there was no interim order granted by this Court, by making a misrepresentation to the Court, got the interim order extended. This Court vide order dated 15.04.2025 made it clear that petition is filed in 2022 and there is no stay granted in this case and trial has already been commenced and charges are framed, hence no ground to stay the trial proceedings. When such observation is made, by making misrepresentation got an order of extension of interim order even though there was no such
HC-KAR
interim order. Hence, the question of entertaining the petition under Section 482 does not arise. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47