Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9712/2024 of SHRI. VINAY SHANBHAG @ VINAYA VENKATESHA SHANBHAG Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010506082024 NC: 2026:KHC:52456 CRL.P No. 9712 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9712 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SHRI. VINAY SHANBHAG @ VINAYA VENKATESHA SHANBHAG
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9712 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SHRI. VINAY SHANBHAG
@ VINAYA VENKATESHA SHANBHAG
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
S/O. LATE VENKATESH SHANBHAG,
RESIDING AT: RADHA KRISHNA NILAYA,
KARIGUNDI ROAD,
SIRSI-581 301.
PERMANENT RESIDENT AT
GOLAGOD, SIDDAPURA,
UTTARA KANNADA-581 355.
2.
SMT. GEETHA
@ GEETHA VENKATESHA SHANBHAG
W/O. LATE VENKATESH SHANBHAG,
RESIDING AT: RADHA KRISHNA NILAYA,
KARIGUNDI ROAD,
SIRSI-581 301.
PERMANENT RESIDENT AT
GOLAGOD, SIDDAPURA,
UTTARA KANNADA-581 355.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ABISHEK N.N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY MAHILA POLICE STATION,
SHIMOGGA,
REP THROUGH
THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2.
MISS. LAKSHMI S @ SRILAKSHMI
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
C/O. SHRI. VIJAY KUMAR,
RESIDING AT: INDIRA GANDHI LAYOUT,
NEAR ARUNODAYA SCHOOL,
NAVULE, SHIMOGGA-577201.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.MAHESHA P., HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE CC NO.1974/2021, CRIME
NO.50/2021 UNDER SECTION 498A, 504, 506, 323 R/W 34 OF
IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2/ACCUSED NO.1
AND 2 PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE II JMFC, SHIMOGA I.E., CHARGE SHEET.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners.
Despite granting several opportunities to the learned counsel for the petitioners he has not complied with the office objections. Though this matter is posted for the compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that learned counsel for the petitioners is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
GPG/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25