Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9656/2024 of SRI NISHAN Vs THE STATE BY SRIMANGALA PS on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010465542024 NC: 2026:KHC:52935 CRL.P No. 9656 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9656 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI NISHAN S/O MUTHANNA C.V, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010465542024
NC: 2026:KHC:52935
CRL.P No. 9656 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9656 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI NISHAN
S/O MUTHANNA C.V,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
REVENUE OFFICER,
HUDIKERI VIRAJPET TALUK,
PRESENTLY POONAMPET TALUK,
PRESENTLY FOOD INSPECTOR
TALUK OFFICE, PONNEMPET TALUK,
KODAGU DISTRICT-571 216
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANDESH R, ADVOCATE- ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE BY SRIMANGALA PS
SRIMANGALA TOWN,
PONNAMPET TALUK,
KODAGU DISTRICT-571216
2.
KUPPANAMADA
S/O LATE GANESH,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
BIRUNANI VILLAGE,
VIRAJPET TALUK,
PRESENTLY POONAMPET TALUK,
KODAGU DISTRICT-571216
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 10.10.2023
AND ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.830/2023 THE ACCUSED
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010465542024
NC: 2026:KHC:52935
CRL.P No. 9656 of 2024
NO.2 TOWARDS THE OFFENCE P/U/S 417, 465, 467, 468, 471, 420 R/W 34 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for seventh time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10