Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6635/2026 of FARHEEN @ FARHEEN TAJ Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010305512026 NC: 2026:KHC:52405 CRL.P No. 6635 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6635 OF 2026 BETWEEN: FARHEEN @ FARHEEN TAJ, D/O SYED ANSAR PASHA,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6635 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
FARHEEN @ FARHEEN TAJ,
D/O SYED ANSAR PASHA,
W/O TABRAIZ PASHA,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
R/AT GOVINDAPURA 9TH CROSS,
NEAR RASHEEDA MASJID, BENGALURU.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI SYED KHALEEL PASHA,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY KALASIPALYA PS BANGALORE CITY,
REP BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT, BANGALORE -560001.
2.
SYED WASEEM,
S/O SYED ALEEM,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT HOUSE NO-4/2, 4TH CROSS,
LBF ROAD, DODDAMAVALLI,
BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA 560004.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI NAGHARISH G S, HCGP FOR R1,
SRI V LAKSHMIKANTH, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING
THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH
THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER /
HC-KAR
ACCUSED IN CR.NO.0051/2026 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES
P/U/S 305 OF BNS 2023, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
HONBLE 5TH ADDL. CMM COURT, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE CITY, ARISING OUT OF KALASIPALYAM POLICE
STATION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1-State and the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
2. The complaint is filed alleging theft. Petitioner is one of the persons named in the complaint along with some other persons.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, the complaint is filed on 27.02.2026 and the complainant is the relative of the petitioner.
4. It is the further submission that, there is a hidden agenda to separate the petitioner from her husband based on this false allegation.
HC-KAR
5. It is the further submission that, the petitioner has co-operated for the investigation and has attended the Police Station as and when the Police have called the petitioner to attend the Police Station, and it is only on 22.06.2026 the Court has granted the stay order.
6. Learned High Court Government Pleader submits that appropriate report will be filed based on the investigation.
7. The Court has noticed that the stay is granted only against the petitioner. There was no stay against the other accused named in the complaint.
8. Considering the nature of the offence alleged, the Court is of the view that the appropriate report has to be filed within a reasonable time.
9. With these observations, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22