Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/12579/2024 of SRI VIJENDRA RAO K Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010645502024 NC: 2026:KHC:52943 CRL.P No. 12579 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12579 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI VIJENDRA RAO K AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O. MR.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12579 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI VIJENDRA RAO K
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
S/O. MR. K. K. RAO,
R/AT NO.38, 39, GROUND FLOOR,
1ST MAIN, 4TH CROSS,
BALAJI LAYOUT,
BABUSAPALYA,
BANGALORE-560 043.
2.
SMT. VIJAYALAXMI RAO. K
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
W/O. VIJENDRA RAO. K,
R/AT NO. 12, JAI GANESH PLAZA,
RAMASWAMY PALYA,
KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 033.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SREENIVAS R, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY SHO,
SHIMOGA WOMEN POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY SPP,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU-560 001.
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
POOJA. N. M.
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
D/O. MANJUNATHA. N. E.,
R/AT RATNESH KUNJ,
5TH CROSS, B BLOCK,
GANDHI NAGAR,
SHIMOGA-577 201.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESH P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS)
PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR REGISTERED BY THE 1st RESPONDENT IN THEIR CR.NO.72/2023 ON 07.07.2023 ON
THE COMPLAINT MADE BY THE 2nd RESPONDENT, FOR
OFFENCES P/U/S 498(A),323,504,506 AND 34 OF IPC, 1860, SEC.3 AND 4 OF DP ACT, 1961, AND CHARGE SHEET FILED IN
CC.NO.495/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED JMFC 2nd COURT SHIVAMOGGA.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned HCGP for respondent No.1 on instructions submits that the petition may be dismissed, since the proceedings challenged in this petition has been ended up with an acquittal.
HC-KAR
2. In view of the above submission, the petition is dismissed.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 22