Karnataka High Court

CRL.RP/1163/2025 of SRI. MURALI Vs SMT. PARVATHAMMA on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010518662025 NC: 2026:KHC:52692 CRL.RP No. 1163 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1163 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. MURALI S/O KODANDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010518662025

NC: 2026:KHC:52692

CRL.RP No. 1163 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1163 OF 2025

BETWEEN:

SRI. MURALI

S/O KODANDAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

R/AT MARAVALLI VILLAGE,

S.G. KOTE POST,

BANGARPET TALUK - 563 114.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. NARAYANASWAMY K.N, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. PARVATHAMMA

W/O LATE SRINIVAS,

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

R/AT RAILWAY TRACK,

SUBRAMANI LAYOUT, DESHIHALLI,

BANGARPET - 563 114.

…RESPONDENT

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED

U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

AND

ORDER

OF CONVICTION DATED ON 16.01.2025 PASSED IN C.C.NO.77/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL.CIVIL AND J.M.F.C AT BANGARPET AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 03.07.2025 PASSED

Digitally Signed By: K B GEETHA

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010518662025 NC: 2026:KHC:52692 CRL.RP No. 1163 of 2025

IN CRL.A.NO.11/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR (SITTING AT K.G.F).

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GEETHA. K.B.

ORAL ORDER

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed memo dated 17.09.2026.

It is stated in the memo that the parties have settled the dispute and hence the revision petitioner is withdrawing the revision petition.

Memo is accepted.

Revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE

VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

Digitally Signed By: K B GEETHA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead