Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/4973/2020 of MR. GUNENDRAPAL SINGH Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010292372020 NC: 2026:KHC:52390 CRL.P No. 4973 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4973 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. MR. GUNENDRAPAL SINGH SON OF MR. FATEH SINGH AGED 51
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010292372020
NC: 2026:KHC:52390
CRL.P No. 4973 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4973 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. GUNENDRAPAL SINGH
SON OF MR. FATEH SINGH
AGED 51 YEARS
AT NO.B 301
ADARSH PALM RETREAT TOWER 1
DEVARABISANAHALLI
BENGALURU -560103
2.
MR. PRASHANT G WADNERKAR
S/O MR. GANGADHAR NARHAR WADNERKAR
AGED 55 YEARS
AT NO.66-B, BOMMASANDRA
INDUSTRIAL AREA, HOSUR ROAD
BENGALURU – 560099
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VEDANTH VIJAYAN, ADVOCATE (VC) FOR
SRI ARJUN RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
AT THE INSTANCE OF
SRI T V NARAYANAPPA
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FACTORIES
BANGALORE DIVISION 3
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010292372020
NC: 2026:KHC:52390
CRL.P No. 4973 of 2020
2ND FLOOR, KARMIKA BHAVANA
BANNERGHATTA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560029
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI SUHAS GOWDA M, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.07.2018 AND
SUBSEQUENT ORDER PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL
JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND J.M.F.C., ANEKAL (ANNEXURE-A) IN
C.C.NO.1270/2018 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The counsel for the petitioners who appears through video conferencing submits that the matter is settled and hence, the petition has become infructuous. The said oral submission is taken on record. In view of the said oral submission of the counsel for the petitioners, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN