Karnataka High Court

COMAP/197/2026 of SRI P.S. SANKAR, Vs M/S THE BANGALORE PRINTING AND on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010256262026 NC: 2026:KHC:52387-DB COMAP No. 197 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 197 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI P.S.

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN

COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 197 OF 2026

BETWEEN:

SRI P.S. SANKAR,

S/O LATE SOMU DEVAR,

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

PROPRIETOR OF RATHIMENA TRAVELS,

NO.90/3, MYSURU ROAD,

CHAMARAJAPET,

BENGALURU - 560018.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. A.C. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE)

AND:

M/S THE BANGALORE PRINTING AND

PUBLISHING CO. LTD.,

A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER

THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956,

HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO. 88,

MYSURU ROAD, CHAMARAJAPET,

BENGALURU - 560018,

REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR,

SRI VISHNU A.H.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR S., ADVOCATE FOR C/R)

THIS COMAP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1-A) OF

COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO ALLOW THE

INSTANT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE

Digitally

signed by

VASANTHA

KUMARY B

K

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

PASSED BY THE LEARNED LXXXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND

SESSIONS JUDGE, COMMERCIAL COURT, BENGALURU (CCH-

83) DATED 28.01.2026 IN COM.O.S.NO.1051/2025 AND

FURTHER TO DISMISS SAID SUIT i.e., COM.O.S.NO.1051/2025

INSTITUTED BY THE RESPONDENT.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

The present Commercial Court appeal under Section 13 (1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 has been filed impugning the judgment and decree dated 28.01.2026 passed in Com.O.S.No.1051/2025 by the Commercial Court.

2. The appellant was a tenant in respect of the premises owned by the respondent-plaintiff in pursuance to the lease deed dated 09.03.2022. The lease was for a period of 11 months, in respect of non-residential premises, at a monthly rent of Rs.2,36,940/- plus applicable GST.

3. Clause 15 of the said lease deed provides that in the event tenant continued to occupy the premises after 11

HC-KAR

months (expiry of the lease period) without any consent of the landlord, the tenant would be liable to pay an additional amount of Rs.95,000/- per month, besides the amounts stipulated under the lease deed, including interest and damages.

4. It is not in dispute that the initial period of 11 months expired and that the appellant continued in occupation of the premises thereafter without obtaining the consent of the respondent/plaintiff and without execution of any fresh lease deed. Consequently, the respondent/plaintiff instituted the suit seeking ejectment and recovery of mesne profits/damages at the enhanced rate of Rs.3,91,689/- per month from 09.01.2023 until delivery of vacant possession of the premises.

5. The learned Commercial Court decreed the suit and directed the appellant/defendant to pay arrears towards rent/mesne profits/damages in a sum of Rs.37,21,633/-.

6. Today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has handed over the keys of the schedule premises to the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/plaintiff.

HC-KAR

7. The learned counsel for the appellant does not seriously dispute the finding of the Commercial Court inasmuch as the mesne profit and damages have been arrived on the basis of the agreement of lease dated 09.03.2022. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is ready and willing to clear the amount of arrears of rent/mesne profits/damages as ordered by the Commercial Court, after giving due adjustment to the advance amount/security deposit, paid to the respondent/plaintiff at the time of execution of the lease deed.

8. In view of the above submissions and the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant is granted four months' time from today to pay the amount payable under the decree, after giving due adjustment of the advance amount paid by the appellant to the respondent/plaintiff at the time of execution of the lease deed.

9. The amount so payable shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of actual payment. The judgment and decree of the learned Commercial Court stands modified to the aforesaid

HC-KAR

extent. Let the modified decree be drawn accordingly. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE

Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE

RKA CT:SM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead