Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/4936/2024 of RAGHAVENDRA K A Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010232842024 NC: 2026:KHC:52933 CRL.P No. 4936 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4936 OF 2024 BETWEEN: RAGHAVENDRA K.A S/O LATE K.N ASHWATHANARAYANA RAO

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4936 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

RAGHAVENDRA K.A

S/O LATE K.N ASHWATHANARAYANA RAO

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

R/A NO.445

SRI KRISHNA NIDHI

33RD CROSS, 7TH MAIN

4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR

BANGALORE-560 011

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. UMASHANKAR B. M, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY J.P NAGAR POLICE

REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

BANGALORE-560001

2.

K RAVINDRAN

W/O LATE NARAYANAN

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

NO.597, SHREE KRISHNA BLOSSOM

2A, 2ND FLOOR, 7TH MAIN, 11TH CROSS

3RD PHASE, J.P NAGAR

BENGALURU-560053

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)

Digitally signed

by PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO

QUASH

THE

FIR

DATED

25.03.2018

FILED

BY

THE

COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE IN CR.NO.93/2018

FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 427, 342 AND 447 OF IPC ON THE

FILE OF XXX ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU AND SUBSEQUENTLY

FILED CHARGE SHEET FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 427, 342 AND

448 OF IPC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.

2. Despite granting sufficient opportunity to comply with the office objections, there is no compliance of the same. As the petition is of the year 2024, it seems that neither the petitioner nor the counsel for the petitioner is interested in prosecuting this petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.

HC-KAR

3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.

SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead