Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/4948/2020 of SMT. LAKSHMINARASAMMA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010291912020 NC: 2026:KHC:52596 CRL.P No. 4948 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4948 OF 2020 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMINARASAMMA, w/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4948 OF 2020
(482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. LAKSHMINARASAMMA,
w/O LATE ANJINAPA,
AGE ABOUT 72 YEARS,
2.
SRI. GOPALAPPA,
S/O LATE ANJINAPA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
3.
SRI. RAMACHANDRAPPA,
S/O LATE ANJINAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDENT OF
KAMMASANDRA VILLAGE,
SULLIBELE HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
BANGALORE - 562 114.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K.H., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
CHANNARAYAPATNA POLICE STATION,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 135.
REP BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU - 560 001.
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SRI. MUNIYAPPA,
S/O LATE CHANNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF CHANNAHALLI VILLAGE,
CHANNARAYAPATTANA HOBLI,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
BANGALORE - 562 135.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SUHAS GOWDA M, HCGP FOR R1/STATE, SRI. M.V. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C BY
THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS
HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE
REGISTRATION OF CASE IN CR.NO.50/2020 FOR THE OFFENCE
P/U/S 420, 465, 468, 471 R/W 34 OF IPC AGAINST THEM ON
THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND J.M.F.C., DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, IN SO FAR AS IT
RELEATES TO THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks time and learned counsel for the respondent No.1/State submits that police have already investigated the matter and filed the charge sheet.
HC-KAR
The relief sought for in the petition is only for quashing of FIR. In view of filing of the charge sheet, the petition has become infructuous. Hence, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Court, if any they have any grievance against the charge sheet.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30