Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/11328/2024 of SMT BHAGYALATHA Vs SRI J AJAYKUMAR on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010599262024 NC: 2026:KHC:52942 CRL.P No. 11328 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11328 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT BHAGYALATHA W/O M.C NAGESH AGED ABOUT 64
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11328 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT BHAGYALATHA
W/O M.C NAGESH
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
2.
SRI. M.C NAGESH
S/O M CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
3.
SRI. M.N KAILASH
S/O M.C NAGESH
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
4.
SRI. M.N YASHAS
S/O M C NAGESH
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE
R/O GARDEN HOUSE
CHANNEGOWDANA DODDI
NOW CALLED AS H K V NAGAR
BENGALURU, MYSURU ROAD
MADDUR, MANDYA-571 428
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. P. MAHESHA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
SRI. J. AJAYKUMAR
S/O J.E RAMASWAMY
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AGED ABOIUT 55 YEARS
R/O LAKKAVVANAHALLI ROAD
HIRIYUR TOWN, CHITRADURGA
DISTRICT-577 598
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
01.08.2024 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE AT MANDYA, PASSED IN CRL. RP NO.
25/2022 AND CONSEQUENTLY CONFIRM THE ORDER DATED
16.02.2022 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC AT MADDUR IN CC NO.19/2016.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20