Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/11139/2024 of NITHYANANDA Vs STATE BY on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010581332024 NC: 2026:KHC:52939 CRL.P No. 11139 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11139 OF 2024 BETWEEN: NITHYANANDA S/O H.G.NANJUNDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 28
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010581332024
NC: 2026:KHC:52939
CRL.P No. 11139 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11139 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
NITHYANANDA
S/O H.G.NANJUNDASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
R/O OPP TO KARUMARIYAMMA TEMPLE,
NEAR "D" BUS STAND, KAMALANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 011
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANDEEP H.S, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
STATE BY
BASAVESHWARANAGAR POLICE
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.CNO.25746/2019
(CR.NO.71/2016) FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 399 AND 402 OF
IPC
AGAINST
THE
PETITIONER
BY
THE
RESPONDENT
BASAVESHVARANAGAR POLICE PENDING ON THE FILE OF XXIV
ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010581332024
NC: 2026:KHC:52939
CRL.P No. 11139 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Despite granting sufficient opportunity to comply with the office objections, there is no compliance of the same. As the petition is of the year 2024, it seems that neither the petitioner nor the counsel for the petitioner is interested in prosecuting this petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 17