Karnataka High Court
WP/27109/2025 of SRI M RAVINDRANATH Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010592752025 NC: 2026:KHC:52660 WP No. 27109 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 27109 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI M RAVINDRANATH S/O LATE K. MUDDAIAH
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO. 27109 OF 2025 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI M RAVINDRANATH
S/O LATE K. MUDDAIAH
AGE ABOUT 62 YEARS
OCC: CLUSTER SUPERVISOR
TALUK PANCHAYATH,
MANDYA TALK,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B M HALASWAMY., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND
PANCHAYAT RAJ
VIKASASOUDHA
BANGALORE - 560 001
2.
KARNATAKA STATE RURAL LIVELIHOOD
MISSION SANJEEVINI
NO 4 2ND FLOOR,
MYSUGAR BUILDING
J.C.ROAD
Digitally
signed by
PRAKASH N
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BANGALORE - 560 002
REPRESENTED BY ITS MISSION DIRECTOR
3.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ZILLA PANCHAYAT
MANDYA - 571 401.
4.
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
TALUK PANCHAYAT
MANDYA - 571 401
5.
THE PROJECT DIRECTOR (DRDA)
ZILLA PANCHAYAT
MANDYA - 571 401.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. ASHVINI PATIL, AGA FOR R1;
SRI M. CHAMARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI J.M. ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4; R5 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
***
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO (A) SET-ASIDE
THE
COMMUNICATION
DATED
25.08.2025
ANNEXURE-J
ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT
TO TERMINATE THE SERVICE OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo reading as hereunder: "The undersigned counsel for the petitioner most respectfully submits that the petitioner has given instruction to withdraw the above writ petition for the reasons well-known to the petitioner and as per the instructions the memo is filed for withdrawal and the same above may be taken note on records and the memo may be allowed, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the above petition in the interest of justice and equity."
The memo is taken on record.
2. In light of the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP