Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/3789/2024 of SRI RAGHAVENDRA @ RAGHAVENDRA R Vs STATE BY JAYANAGAR POLICE STATION on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010219232024 NC: 2026:KHC:52931 CRL.P No. 3789 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3789 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI RAGHAVENDRA @ RAGHAVENDRA R S/O LATE B.K
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3789 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI RAGHAVENDRA @ RAGHAVENDRA R
S/O LATE B.K RAMANNA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 65, M.R GARDEN,
SANJAYNAGAR,
BENGALURU-560094.
2.
SRI. LOKESH B.K
S/O SRI. KESHVAIAH,
NO.71, FLAT NO. 4-B, 4TH FLOOR,
KRISHNATA KUTEERA,
APARTMENT, BASAVANAGUDI,
BENGALURU-560004.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATH H, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE BY JAYANAGAR POLICE STATION
JAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE
DULY REPRESENTED BY
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
2.
SRI PRAKASH H.N
S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF P.H HALLI VILLAGE,
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
HULIYUR DURGA HOBLI,
KUNIGAL TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 123.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
ALLOW THE PETITION AND QUASH THE CR.NO.116/2024
REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE ON THE
COMPLAINT MADE BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AGAINST THE
PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 419,420,467,468,471
R/W 34 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for sixth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5