Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/7722/2024 of SRI. K RAGHAVENDRA POOJARY Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010378972024 NC: 2026:KHC:52455 CRL.P No. 7722 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7722 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. K.RAGHAVENDRA POOJARY S/O KRISHNA POOJARI, AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7722 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

SRI. K.RAGHAVENDRA POOJARY

S/O KRISHNA POOJARI,

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

R/AT NO.13-97, EDERI GADDE,

THAGGARSE POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK,

THAGARASI, UDUPI 576214.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SUYOG HERELE E.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

THROUGH MANGALORE WOMEN PS,

REPRESENTED BY SPP,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING,

BENGALURU 560001.

2.

SMT. SHOBHA,

W/O BASAVARAJU,

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

R/AT GOLIJARU, KINNIGOLI,

MULKY, MANGALORE CITY,

D.K.DISTRICT 575001.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. .,ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by

PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO

ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL PETITION AND QUASH THE FIR AND

COMPLIANT

IN

CR.NO.0123/2023

REGISTERED

BY

THE

RESPONDENT WOMEN P.S. MANGALORE (ON THE FILE OF

LEARNED 3RED JMFC COURT MANGALORE) FOR THE ALLEGED

OFFENCE P/US/ 354A, 354D, 504, 506 OF IPC PRODUCED AT

DOCUMENT NO.1 AND 2 AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

This petition is of the year 2024. Despite granting several opportunities to the learned counsel for the petitioner he has not complied with the office objections. Though this matter is posted for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.

HC-KAR

If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.

SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

GPG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 24

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead