Karnataka High Court
RFA/1603/2026 of MR.NATARAJA.T Vs MS.K.SHOBHA on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010528662026 NC: 2026:KHC:52927 RFA No. 1603 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1603 OF 2026 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. MR. NATARAJA.T S/O. MR. THAMMAIAH
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010528662026
NC: 2026:KHC:52927
RFA No. 1603 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1603 OF 2026 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. NATARAJA.T
S/O. MR. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
R/AT NO.49,
ANJANEYASWAMY TEMPLE STREET,
UTTARAHALLI,
SUBRAMANYAPURA
BENGALURU – 560 061.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NISHANTH A V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MS. K.SHOBHA
W/O LATE B.K.MARIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
R/AT NEAR GEETHA EYE CLINIC
SAMPIGE ROAD, K.R.PURAM
HASSAN – 573 201.
2.
MR. M.K.BALAMURTHY
S/O. MR KEMPE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
OM SHIVA SHAKTHI NAGAR
RBI LAYOUT MAIN ROAD
R/AT: NO.16/A, 6TH CROSS
DODDAKALLASANDRA
J.P. NAGAR, 7TH PHASE
BENGALURU – 560 062.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. NARASIMHARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
Digitally
signed by N
UMA
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010528662026
NC: 2026:KHC:52927
RFA No. 1603 of 2026
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED.27.03.2026 PASSED IN OS
NO.2461/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (CCH-12), BENGALURU AND
ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to raise all the contentions available to the appellant in the comprehensive suit in O.S.No.25981/2026.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE rv, Sl No.: 47