Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10447/2024 of SRI M D JAMAL PARWEZ Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010540382024 NC: 2026:KHC:52937 CRL.P No. 10447 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10447 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. M.D JAMAL PARWEZ SON OF JALAL UDDIN AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010540382024
NC: 2026:KHC:52937
CRL.P No. 10447 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10447 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. M.D JAMAL PARWEZ
SON OF JALAL UDDIN
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
NO.05, DUBEY GALI
DARIYAPUR ROAD,
SABJIBAGH, PATNA-80004
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. LOKESHA M.P, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BANGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE AT BANGALORE
REPRESENTED BY
STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER,
HIGH COURT COMPLEX,
BANGALORE -560 001
2.
SRI. ANIL KUMAR AROLIKAR
SON OF SIDRAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
TAHSILDAR, YELAHANKA
YELAHANKA TALUK OFFICE,
YELAHANKA, BANGALORE 560064
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.06/2024
FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 192(A) OF KARNATAKA LAND
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010540382024
NC: 2026:KHC:52937
CRL.P No. 10447 of 2024
REVENUE
ACT
1964 REGISTERED
BY
THE
BENGALURU
METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE IN 6TH ACMM AT BANGALORE, AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.12, ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14