Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/1418/2020 of SMT. MONIJA R Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010068332020 NC: 2026:KHC:52056 CRL.P No. 1418 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1418 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MONIJA R., W/O NAGENDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 24
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1418 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. MONIJA R.,
W/O NAGENDRA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS.
2.
SMT. JAYALAKSHMI,
W/O LATE ROZARIO,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.
3.
SHRI. VIKAS,
S/O LATE ROZARIO,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS.
ALL RESIDING AT NO.146/C-1,
VIGNAN NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560075.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KADIRA RAMI REDDY &
SRI. ASHOKA E., ADVOCATES FOR PETITIONER No.1)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY VARTHUR POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
SHRI. SRINIVASA G.R.,
S/O RAMAIAH REDDY,
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.47,
DASAR STREET, GUNJURU,
BENGALURU CITY,
KARNATAKA-560087.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; SRI. NARAYANA REDDY M., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN
C.C.NO.11499/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE VARTHUR POLICE
STATION FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS
306, 427, 304 AND 448 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC OF 2ND
ADDITIONAL
CHIEF
JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE,
BENGALURU
RURAL DISTRICT.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for petitioner No.1 is absent.
2. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 files a memo stating that the offences were compounded and as a result, the accused persons are acquitted. Hence, in view of the settlement arrived between the parties and invoking of Section 320 of Cr.P.C. and compounding of the offence, this petition does not survive for consideration.
HC-KAR
3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22