Karnataka High Court
WP/21499/2024 of BHAVYA J Vs KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010441432024 NC: 2026:KHC:52132 WP No. 21499 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 21499 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: BHAVYA J D/O SRI H G JANGAMAPPA AGED BOUT 39
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO. 21499 OF 2024 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
BHAVYA J
D/O SRI H G JANGAMAPPA
AGED BOUT 39 YEARS
OCCUPATION: ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PROJECT
OFFICE, E BLOCK 5TH FLOOR
KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD
CAUVERY BHAVAN
BANGALORE - 560 009
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR J.M.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 009
REP BY ITS THE COMMISSIONER
2.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
HOUSING DEPARTMENT
VIKAS SOUDHA
BANGALORE - 560 001
3.
SRI A VIJAYA KUMAR BHANDARY
S/O LATE NAGAYYA BHANDARY
Digitally
signed by
PRAKASH N
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
OCCUPATION: ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
DISTRICT PROJECT OFFICE
KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD
BONDEL MANGALURU - 575 015
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHISHIRA AMARNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R2
SRI. S. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3
SRI. OMKARA K.B., ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TODIRECTING THE R1
TO CONSIDER ELIGIBILITY OF PETITIONER FOR PROMOTION
RETROSPECTIVELY AGAINST ROSTER POINT NO. 14 FOR THE
POST OF ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal.
2. In light of the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
HC-KAR
3. Liberty as prayed for is reserved to be exercised as is permissible in law.
4. All contentions are kept open.
5. In view of dismissal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2024 does not survive for consideration and is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE SKS