Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/131/2020 of SMT R SARASWATHI Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010452312019 NC: 2026:KHC:52221 CRL.P No. 131 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.131 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. R SARASWATHI AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS W/O LATE K V

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.131 OF 2020

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. R SARASWATHI

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

W/O LATE K V NATARAJAN

R/AT NO. L-120/1

LAKSHMINARAYANAPURA

SRIRAMPURAM

BENGALURU 560021

2.

SRI V N HARI PRASAD

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

S/O LATE K V NATARAJAN

R/AT NO. L-120/1

LAKSHMINARAYANAPURA

SRIRAMPURAM

BENGALURU 560021

3.

SMT. V N NIRANJANI

MAJOR

D/O LATE K V NATARAJAN

R/AT NO. L-120/1

LAKSHMINARAYANAPURA

SRIRAMPURAM

BENGALURU 560021

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. VENKATESH R BHAGAT, ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

KUMBALGUDU POLICE STATION

MAGADI SUB DIVISION

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT

IN THE HIGH COURT BY

STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

BENGALURU-01

2.

M/S JAYANAGARA STHREE SAMAJA TRUST

REGISTERED OFFICE AT

NO.141, 5TH CROSS

10TH ‘A’ MAIN ROAD, 1ST BLOCK

JAYANAGAR

BENGALURU-560011

REP BY ITS TRUSTEES

SMT. RAMA KESHAVA MURTHY (PRESIDENT)

SMT. SUSHEELAMMA (SECRETARY)

3.

SMT. RAMA KESHAVAMURTHY

AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS

W/O S G KESHAVA MURTHY

R/AT NO.1628, “JAYASHREE”

8TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD BLOCK

JAYANAGAR

BENGLAURU-560011

4.

SMT. SUSHEELAMMA SUNDAR RAO

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

R/AT NO.508, 10TH ‘B’ MAIN

1ST BLOCK, JAYANAGAR

BENGALURU 560011

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI SUHAS GOWDA M, HCGP FOR R1;

SRI R BHADRINATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)

HC-KAR

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO

QUASH THE ENTIRE INVESTIGATION IN FIR NO.206/2018

FILED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUMBALGUDU P.S., MAGADI SUB DIVISION, RAMANAGAR FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S

403, 404, 405, 406, 415, 418, 420, 425, 506, 120B R/W 34 OF

IPC AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners; the learned counsel appearing for the State and also the counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

2. The prayer sought in this petition is for quashing of the entire investigation in FIR No.206/2018 arising out of PCR No.746/2018 filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kumbalgudu police station, Magadi Sub Division, Ramanagar for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 404, 405, 406, 415, 418, 420, 425, 506, 120B R/W 34 of IPC against these petitioners who are accused Nos.5 to 7.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would contend that these petitioners are nowhere connected in

HC-KAR

the alleged offences and the allegations are only against accused No.1. The counsel appearing for the respondents/complainants also not disputes the said fact. On perusal of the PCR, it discloses that the specific allegations are made against others and not against these petitioners, who have been arraigned as accused Nos.5 to 7. Having perused the FIR also, allegations are against others for having received the amount of Rs.10,00,000/- as against the agreement for Rs.45,00,000/- and so also a suit was filed in O.S.No.4210/2017 in this regard.

4. The counsel appearing for the State would submit that based on the reference made by the Trial Court, case was registered and it requires trial.

5. Having heard the counsel appearing for the respective parties and also taking into note of the contents of the complaint and the FIR which is registered based on the reference made by the Trial Court, it discloses that in the contents of complaint in PCR No.746/2018, nothing is found against the accused Nos.5 to 7. Accused Nos.1 to 4 are the sons of late K. V. Vijayan, accused No.5 is the wife; accused

HC-KAR

No.6 is the son and accused No.7 is the daughter of late K. V. Natarajan. When there are no specific allegations against these petitioners, the question of continuing the criminal proceedings against these petitioners does not arise. Hence, it is a fit case to exercise the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

6. In view of the discussion made above, I pass the following:

ORDER

(i) The petition is allowed.

(ii) The proceedings initiated against these petitioners who are accused Nos.5 to 7 in Cr.No.206/2018 arising out of PCR No.746/2018 are hereby quashed.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

SN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead